Embo under editorial consideration. EMBO Rep 24: e58155 Google Scholar Schnapp E, Pulverer B (2022) Publishing unpredictable research outcomes. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The work described has not been published in a peer reviewed journal, and is not under consideration for publication at another peer reviewed journal. “Under editorial consideration” means that it has been assigned to an editor. The published work complies with EMBO Press editorial EMBO Molecular Medicine is enriched by a number of innovative policies designed to enhance the editorial process: peer review process files, de-emphasis of confidential referee comments and cross-refereeing. Its publication has been approved by all co-authors, and the responsible authorities at the institute where the work has been carried out. The EMBO Journal owes its continued strength and significance to the many authors who submit interesting manuscripts for consideration and who work productively with the editorial process to make papers as good as they can be. More signifi cantly, most had a lower citation rate than the aver-age EMBO paper. 小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » EMBO Journal under editorial consideration 什么意思 相关版块跳转 论文投稿 我要订阅楼主 临风7071 的主题更新 马上under editorial consideration，后5天拒稿。 但拒稿信很牵强。 但可以转投其他embo期刊 投稿总结 《EMBO Molecular Medicine》这个期刊对文章质量要求很高，除非有较好的成果，不然不建议投稿。 不过期刊的审稿效率较高，意见反馈的很快。 综合指标 1、影响因子 <span class="quote">591266912_22725428 2019-02-03 00:00:00 发表:<br>请问你的under editorial consideration 状态多久有变化？ Berlin S (2023) Reconsidering editorial consideration. 2 ) Pub Date : 2023-09-25 , DOI: 10. The published work complies with EMBO Press editorial . The journal pioneered numerous enhancements of the publishing process to best support the scientific community. EMBO Rep 24: e58127 Google Scholar Lemberger T, Pulverer B (2021) Review Commons‐pre‐journal peer review. EMBO Reports ( IF 6. 202358127 Shai Berlin 1 I would like to end this editorial on a quite different note, expressing gratitude and appreciation. EMBO Reports invites well-developed studies that either confirm or refute prominent claims in the literature, as well as null data on important, open questions in the biosciences. In general terms, “manuscript under consideration” means that the journal has received the manuscript but not yet assigned it to an editor. 15252/embr. Also tracked were papers rejected in the fi rst phase of the editorial proc-ess that were re-introduced into the system Reconsidering editorial consideration: Changing editorial assessment could reduce subjectivity in the publication process. Over 90 % of the papers that were subsequently published appeared in journals of lower impact. Recently EMBO analysed the fate of papers rejected by The EMBO Journal and EMBO reports in 2004. BioRxiv or medRxiv preprints reviewed by Review Commons can be transferred to 27 affiliated journals for editorial consideration without starting the peer review process afresh. Sep 25, 2023 · Even if editors and editorial boards do their best to stay clear of some or perhaps even most subjective criteria, the extensive rejection rates and the non‐transparent nature of editorial decisions at many journals make it very hard to address and remedy the situation. The published work complies with EMBO Press editorial 2021-05-12 tomsyu Under Editorial Consideration11th May 21 Manuscript Under Peer Review28th Apr 21 Under Editorial Consideration28th Apr 21 Manuscript Received22nd Apr 21 Manuscript Submitted21st Apr 21 这是最近投稿文章状态，可以参考一下 171 5 举报 展开5条回复 Overview Launched in 1982, T he EMBO Journal is EMBO’s flagship publication, recognised worldwide for its originality, breadth, and enduring contributions to molecular biology. EMBO Rep 20: e49663 Google Scholar Pulverer B (2023) Constructive correction. Can rethinking editorial assessment reduce subjectivity and transform the way science is communicated? Sep 25, 2023 · Even if editors and editorial boards do their best to stay clear of some or perhaps even most subjective criteria, the extensive rejection rates and the non‐transparent nature of editorial decisions at many journals make it very hard to address and remedy the situation. Even if editors and editorial boards do their best to stay clear of some or perhaps even most subjective criteria, the extensive rejection rates and the non‐transparent nature of editorial decisions at many journals make it very hard to address and remedy the situation. saquil, h0iybn, 3rysq, dowpb8, ntuhz, 5suwm, 3asazd, oiou, ht3dg, os9u,